Argument of a linear model
On Aug 30, 2012, at 12:08 AM, m4n14ccc wrote:
Hey I have a little problem here: I have an experimental space, lets say [-1,+1]^2, and I fit a second order model above it. Regarding the whole experimental space the regression function maps within [-3,+4], which means nothing else than f^-1([-3,+4])=[-1,+1] Now for example the question is: What is f^-1([-1,+2])=? Is there any inverse function available in order to get the argument of a regression function f?
In a general sense such a problem is ill-defined mathematically because the inverse of a second order quadratic (my assumption regarding what you meant by "second order") will not necessarily be a function in the mathematical sense of being one-to-one. You could first plot and then see if it makes sense to fit a surface to the point set generated by: sapply( seq(-1, 1, by=0.01) , f) (Which could then be limited in your more restricted domain.) You could then predict those elements in seq(-1, 1, 0.01) which had corresponding images in f(seq(.)). It would be more productive if you assembled a test case in R code.
David Winsemius, MD Alameda, CA, USA