mixed model MANCOVA
Hi Erika, I have not tried this before, and I hope that somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but the glmer function in the lme4 library appears to do what you want. From examples(lmer): lmer> (gm1 <- glmer(cbind(incidence, size - incidence) ~ period + (1 | herd), family = binomial, data = cbpp)) ...I guess that this will do what you want it to because it has multiple variables on the LHS and both continuous and categorical variables on the RHS, along with an explicit grouping structure. In your case, you probably want to leave the family= argument out, as noted in ?glmer, "If 'family' is missing then a linear mixed model is fit; otherwise a generalized linear mixed model is fit." ...MANCOVA tend to be generalized linear models. Once again, though, I have not used this system personally, haven't seen your data, and don't know what output to expect. Hopefully somebody else can confirm or deny this solution's efficacy. --Adam
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Erika Crispo wrote:
Hello, I need to perform a mixed-model (with nesting) MANCOVA, using Type III sums of squares. I know how to perform each of these types of tests individually, but I am not sure if performing a mixed-model MANCOVA is possible. Please let me know. Erika <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< Erika Crispo, PhD candidate McGill University, Department of Biology http://www.biology.mcgill.ca/grad/erika/index.htm
<> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.