Message-ID: <XFMail.091107095552.Ted.Harding@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: 2009-11-07T09:55:52Z
From: (Ted Harding)
Subject: a bug with Student t-value??
In-Reply-To: <9eea4cb0911070102m4c2eb062nb840f6b8d372a394@mail.gmail.com>
On 07-Nov-09 09:02:38, huaru wang wrote:
> Hello, every one,
>
> Using the qt() function in R, I got a different Student t-value
> with the Student t table.
> e.g. the return value of function qt(0.95,9) is 1.833, while in
> table it is 2.262.
>
> I do not know why the difference exists. I guess it may be a bug
> in R.
> --
Not at all. The reason is that your table gives the t-value for a
two-sided test (with equal tails), i.e. 0.025 in each tail.
The function qt() in R returns the t-value for a one-sided test,
i.e. 0.05 in the (by default) upper tail. Compare:
qt(0.95,9)
# [1] 1.833113
qt(0.975,9)
# [1] 2.262157
The second value agrees with your table. Many printed tables give
the two-sided values, rather than the one-sided.
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 07-Nov-09 Time: 09:55:50
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------