Skip to content
Prev 318860 / 398521 Next

Issues when using interaction term with a lagged variable

Hello.
It is impossible to be of any real help w/o a reproducible example (see
the Posting Guide).

One guess might be that the data be a regular data.frame, so that
outside the model lag() calls lag.default(), whose behaviour is
different from lag.pseries().

Always better to do things inside formulas.
Best wishes
Giovanni

Giovanni Millo, PhD
Research Dept.,
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
Via Machiavelli 3,
34132 Trieste (Italy)
tel. +39 040 671184
fax  +39 040 671160

--------------- original message ---------------

Message: 58
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 20:54:25 -0300
From: Richard Asturia <richard.asturia at gmail.com>
To: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Issues when using interaction term with a lagged
	variable
Message-ID:
	
<CA+xNL7owdy=YxR_Z24acb8XnWsYdASnmHm8FDEGNsVRbVnQrag at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain

Actually, the problem number 2 is easy to solve: instead of using I(X1 *
lag(X2,1)), one should use X1:lag(X2,1). It works.

The issue number 1 remains, though. And also affects this solution for
number 2. It means: results are different with one uses X1:lag(X2,1)
whithin the formula or uses a new variable previouysly created with
X1*lag(X2,1).

Any insights here would be very hepful.


2013/3/5 Richard Asturia <richard.asturia at gmail.com>
with
interaction
X1 *
the
I(X1
------------- end original message -------------

?
Ai sensi del D.Lgs. 196/2003 si precisa che le informazi...{{dropped:12}}