zero weights in weighted.mean
On 14/07/2021 6:00 a.m., G?ran Brostr?m wrote:
I wonder about the last sentence in the Details section of the documentation of 'weighted.mean': "However, zero weights _are_ handled specially and the corresponding ?x? values are omitted from the sum." The return value of weighted.mean.default is sum((x * w)[w != 0])/sum(w) and indeed, it looks as if zero weights are getting special treatment, but what is wrong with the alternative (equivalent?) expression sum(x * w) / sum(w)? Is it a good idea to remove zeros from a vector before applying 'sum' to it? I don't think so. Anyway, the sentence in the documentation seems to be uncalled for.
Inf*0 is not zero. Setting weights to zero on infinite observations (or NA, or NaN) will give different results in your two expressions. Duncan Murdoch