Function to read a string as the variables as opposed totaking the string name as the variable
As Hadley said, it's complex in general: the standard approach is to assemble the arguments into a list and then use do.call -- ?do.call. Undoubtedly, there are times where this won't do either (at least not without some further tricks). -- Bert Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of hadley wickham Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 11:41 AM To: Lori Simpson Cc: r-help at r-project.org; Max Rausch Subject: Re: [R] Function to read a string as the variables as opposed totaking the string name as the variable On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Lori Simpson
<lori.simpson at dc-energy.com> wrote:
I am writing a custom function that uses an R-function from the reshape package: cast. ?However, my question could be applicable to any R function. Normally one writes the arguments directly into a function, e.g.: result=cast(table1, column1 + column2 + column3 ? ~ ? ?column4, mean) ? ? ?(1) I need to be able to write this statement as follows: result=cast(table1, string_with_columns ? ~ ? ?column4, mean) ? ?(2) string_with_columns = group of functions that ultimately outputs: "column1 + column2 + column3"
It's complex in general, but for cast you can just supply a string: cast(table, paste(string_with_columns, "~ column4")) Hadley
http://had.co.nz/ ______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.