bVar slot of lmer objects and standard errors
Hi, Doug: Thanks. Perhaps the easiest way to check would be to find an example with answers you believe to be correct and compare what this gives you with the presumed "correct" answers. I don't have such an example handy, but Ulrich Keller, who originated this thread, might. If not, maybe he can find another way to check the answer, e.g., via Monte Carlo. Best Wishes, Spencer Graves
Douglas Bates wrote:
On 12/29/05, Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org> wrote:
Uli: The graphic in the paper, sometimes called a catepillar plot, must be created with some programming as there is (as far as I know) not a built-in function for such plots. As for the contents of bVar you say the dimensions are 2,2,28 and there are two random effects and 28 schools. So, from what I know about your model, the third dimension represents the posterior covariance matrix for each of your 28 schools as Spencer notes. For example, consider the following model
library(Matrix) library(mlmRev) fm1 <- lmer(math ~ 1 + (year|schoolid), egsingle)
Then, get the posterior means (modes for a GLMM)
fm1 at bVar$schoolid
These data have 60 schools, so you will see ,,1 through ,,60 and the
elements of each matrix are posterior variances on the diagonals and
covariances in the off-diags (upper triang) corresponding to the
empirical Bayes estimates for each of the 60 schools.
, , 1
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 0.01007129 -0.001272618
[2,] 0.00000000 0.004588049
I'd have to go back and check but I think that these are the upper triangles of the symmetric matrix (as Spencer suggested) that are the conditional variance-covariance matrices of the two-dimensional random effects for each school up to a scale factor. That is, I think each face needs to be multiplied by s^2 to get the actual variance-covariance matrix.
Does this help?
Harold
-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch
[mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Spencer Graves
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 6:58 AM
To: Ulrich Keller
Cc: r-help
Subject: Re: [R] bVar slot of lmer objects and standard errors
Have you received a satisfactory reply to this post? I
haven't seen one. Unfortunately, I can't give a definitive answer, but
I can offer an intelligent guess. With luck, this might encourage
someone who knows more than I do to reply. If not, I hope these
comments help you clarify the issue further, e.g., by reading the source
or other references.
I'm not not sure, but I believe that
lmertest1 at bVar$schoolid[,,i] is the upper triangular part of the
covariance matrix of the random effects for the i-th level of schoolid.
The lower triangle appears as 0, though the code (I believe) iterprets
it as equal to the upper triangle. More precisely, I suspect it is
created from something that is stored in a more compact form, i.e.,
keeping only a single copy of the off-diagonal elements of symmetric
matrices. I don't seem to have access to your "nlmframe", so I can't
comment further on those specifics. You might be able to clarify this
by reading the source code. I've been sitting on this reply for several
days without finding time to do more with it, so I think I should just
offer what I suspect.
The specifics of your question suggest to me that you want to
produce something similar to Figure 1.12 in Pinheiro and Bates (2000)
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus (Springer). That was produced from
an "lmList" object, not an "lme" object, so we won't expect to get their
exact answers. Instead, we would hope to get tighter answers available
from pooling information using "lme"; the function "lmList" consideres
each subject separately with no pooling. With luck, the answers should
be close.
I started by making a local copy of the data:
library(nlme)
OrthoFem <- Orthodont[Orthodont$Sex=="Female",]
Next, I believe to switch to "lme4", we need to quit R
completely and restart. I did that. Then with the following sequence
of commands I produced something that looked roughly similar to the
confidence intervals produced with Figure 1.12:
library(lme4)
fm1OrthF. <- lmer(distance~age+(age|Subject), data=OrthoFem)
fm1.s <- coef(fm1OrthF.)$Subject
fm1.s.var <- fm1OrthF. at bVar$Subject
fm1.s0.s <- sqrt(fm1.s.var[1,1,])
fm1.s0.a <- sqrt(fm1.s.var[2,2,])
fm1.s[,1]+outer(fm1.s0.s, c(-2,0,2))
fm1.s[,2]+outer(fm1.s0.a, c(-2,0,2))
hope this helps.
Viel Glueck.
spencer graves
Ulrich Keller wrote:
Hello, I am looking for a way to obtain standard errors for emprirical Bayes
estimates of a model fitted with lmer (like the ones plotted on page 14 of the document available at http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/000000 0b/80/2b/b3/94.pdf). Harold Doran mentioned (http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/R/help/05/08/10638.html) that the posterior modes' variances can be found in the bVar slot of lmer objects. However, when I fit e.g. this model:
lmertest1<-lmer(mathtot~1+(m_escs_c|schoolid),hlmframe) then lmertest1 at bVar$schoolid is a three-dimensional array with
dimensions (2,2,28). The factor schoolid has 28 levels, and there are random effects for the intercept and m_escs_c, but what does the third dimension correspond to? In other words, what are the contents of bVar, and how can I use them to get standard errors?
Thanks in advance for your answers and Merry Christmas, Uli Keller
______________________________________________ R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
Spencer Graves, PhD Senior Development Engineer PDF Solutions, Inc. 333 West San Carlos Street Suite 700 San Jose, CA 95110, USA spencer.graves at pdf.com www.pdf.com <http://www.pdf.com> Tel: 408-938-4420 Fax: 408-280-7915