Message-ID: <4E8F6E6E.9050604@witthoft.com>
Date: 2011-10-07T21:26:06Z
From: Carl Witthoft
Subject: round() and negative digits
Just wondering here -- I tested and found to my delight that
% round(325.4,-2)
[1] 300
gave me exactly what I would have expected (and wanted). Since it's not
explicitly mentioned in the documentation that negative 'digits' is
allowed, I just wanted to ask whether this behavior is intentional or a
happy turn of events. I'm always paranoid that something not explicitly
documented might disappear in future revisons.
thanks
Carl
--
-----
Sent from my Cray XK6