Skip to content
Prev 251840 / 398498 Next

BFGS versus L-BFGS-B

I have worked on a 2D image reconstruction problem in PET (positron emission
tomography) using a Poisson model.  Here, each pixel intensity is an unknown
parameter.  I have solved problems of size 128 x 128 using an accelerated EM
algorithm.  Ken Lange has shown that you can achieve term by term separation
using a minorization inequality, and hence the problem simplifies greatly.

Ravi.

-------------------------------------------------------
Ravi Varadhan, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor,
Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology School of Medicine Johns
Hopkins University

Ph. (410) 502-2619
email: rvaradhan at jhmi.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Prof. John C Nash
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 5:55 PM
To: Bert Gunter
Cc: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] BFGS versus L-BFGS-B

For functions that have a reasonable structure i.e., 1 or at most a few
optima, it is
certainly a sensible task. Separable functions are certainly nicer (10K 1D
minimizations),
but it is pretty easy to devise functions e.g., generalizations of
Rosenbrock, Chebyquad
and other functions that are high dimension but not separable.

Admittedly, there are not a lot of real-world examples that are publicly
available. More
would be useful.

JN
On 02/25/2011 05:06 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
optimize
______________________________________________
R-help at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.