fast or space-efficient lookup?
Ivo, Also, perhaps FAQ 2.14 helps : "Can you explain further why data.table is inspired by A[B] syntax in base?" http://datatable.r-forge.r-project.org/datatable-faq.pdf And, 2.15 and 2.16. Matthew "Steve Lianoglou" <mailinglist.honeypot at gmail.com> wrote in message news:CAHA9McPQ4P-a2imjm=szgjFxyx0Faw0J79fwq2E87dQkF9JpVw at mail.gmail.com... Hi Ivo,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:58 AM, ivo welch <ivo.welch at gmail.com> wrote:
hi steve---agreed...but is there any other computer language in which an expression in a [ . ] is anything except a tensor index selector?
Sure, it's a type specifier in scala generics: http://www.scala-lang.org/node/113 Something similar to "scale-eez" in haskell. Aslo, MATLAB (ugh) it's not even a tensor selector (they use "normal" parens there). But I'm not sure what that has to do w/ the price of tea in china. With data.table, "[" still is "tensor-selector" like, though. You can just pass in another data.table to use as the "keys" to do your selection through the `i` argument (like "selecting rows"), which I guess will likely be your most common use case if you're moving to data.table (presumably you are trying to take advantage of its quickness over big-table-like objects. You can use the `j` param to further manipulate columns. If you pass in a data.table as `i`, it will add its columns to `j`. I'll grant you that it is different than your standard "rectangular object" selection in R, but the motivation isn't "so strange" as both i,j params in normal calls to 'xxx[i,j]' are for selecting (ok not manipulating) rows and columns on other "rectangular" like objects, too. -steve
Steve Lianoglou Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | Weill Medical College of Cornell University Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact