Skip to content
Prev 165052 / 398503 Next

"Error: bad value" problem

Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Wrong, actually... It did happen when run with 2.8.0 and valgrind (but 
not without it). Unfortunately there were no errors from valgrind.... 
yuck!!!

....
 > a
Error: bad value
 >
 >
Save workspace image? [y/n/c]: n
==29050==
==29050== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 116 from 1)
==29050== malloc/free: in use at exit: 13,984,907 bytes in 10,061 blocks.
==29050== malloc/free: 117,023 allocs, 106,962 frees, 93,104,003 bytes 
allocated.
==29050== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v
==29050== searching for pointers to 10,061 not-freed blocks.
==29050== checked 14,502,208 bytes.
==29050==
==29050== LEAK SUMMARY:
==29050==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==29050==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==29050==    still reachable: 13,984,907 bytes in 10,061 blocks.
==29050==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==29050== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory.
[