how to suppress the intercept in an lm()-like formula method?
On 29/01/2013 9:14 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
To partly answer my own question: It wasn't that hard to hack the
result of model.matrix() to remove the intercept,
remove.intercept <- function(x) {
if (colnames(x)[1] == "(Intercept)") {
x <- x[,-1]
attr(x, "assign") <- attr(x, "assign")[-1]
}
x
}
I think you need to do some of the low level calculations yourself,
specifically the "terms" calculation.
For example, this forces no intercept, regardless of what the user
specifies. You might prefer just to change the default to no intercept
and allow the user to use "+1" to add one, which looks harder...
# .... set formula to the user's formula ...
# Now modify it to suppress the intercept:
class(formula) <- c("nointercept", class(formula))
terms.nointercept <- function(x, ...) {
result <- NextMethod(x, ...)
attr(result, "intercept") <- 0
result
}
Now lm(formula) does a fit with no intercept.
Duncan Murdoch
However, the model frame and therefore the model terms stored in the
object are wrong, still including the intercept:
Browse[1]> str(mt)
Classes 'terms', 'formula' length 3 cbind(SAT, PPVT, Raven) ~ n + s + ns
+ na + ss
..- attr(*, "variables")= language list(cbind(SAT, PPVT, Raven), n,
s, ns, na, ss)
..- attr(*, "factors")= int [1:6, 1:5] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ...
.. ..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
.. .. ..$ : chr [1:6] "cbind(SAT, PPVT, Raven)" "n" "s" "ns" ...
.. .. ..$ : chr [1:5] "n" "s" "ns" "na" ...
..- attr(*, "term.labels")= chr [1:5] "n" "s" "ns" "na" ...
..- attr(*, "order")= int [1:5] 1 1 1 1 1
..- attr(*, "intercept")= int 1
..- attr(*, "response")= int 1
..- attr(*, ".Environment")=<environment: R_GlobalEnv>
..- attr(*, "predvars")= language list(cbind(SAT, PPVT, Raven), n, s,
ns, na, ss)
..- attr(*, "dataClasses")= Named chr [1:6] "nmatrix.3" "numeric"
"numeric" "numeric" ...
.. ..- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:6] "cbind(SAT, PPVT, Raven)" "n" "s"
"ns" ...
Browse[1]>
On 1/29/2013 8:44 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
I'm trying to write a formula method for canonical correlation analysis,
that could be called similarly to lm() for
a multivariate response:
cancor(cbind(y1,y2,y3) ~ x1+x2+x3+x4, data=, ...)
or perhaps more naturally,
cancor(cbind(y1,y2,y3) ~ cbind(x1,x2,x3,x4), data=, ...)
I've adapted the code from lm() to my case, but in this situation, it
doesn't make sense to
include an intercept, since X & Y are mean centered by default in the
computation.
In the code below, I can't see where the intercept gets included in the
model matrix and therefore
how to suppress it. There is a test case at the end, showing that the
method fails when called
normally, but works if I explicitly use -1 in the formula. I could hack
the result of model.matrix(),
but maybe there's an easier way?
cancor <- function(x, ...) {
UseMethod("cancor", x)
}
cancor.default <- candisc:::cancor
# TODO: make cancisc::cancor() use x, y, not X, Y
cancor.formula <- function(formula, data, subset, weights,
na.action,
method = "qr",
model = TRUE,
x = FALSE, y = FALSE, qr = TRUE,
contrasts = NULL, ...) {
cl <- match.call()
mf <- match.call(expand.dots = FALSE)
m <- match(c("formula", "data", "subset", "weights", "na.action"),
names(mf), 0L)
mf <- mf[c(1L, m)]
mf[[1L]] <- as.name("model.frame")
mf <- eval(mf, parent.frame())
mt <- attr(mf, "terms")
y <- model.response(mf, "numeric")
w <- as.vector(model.weights(mf))
if (!is.null(w) && !is.numeric(w))
stop("'weights' must be a numeric vector")
x <- model.matrix(mt, mf, contrasts)
# fixup to remove intercept???
z <- if (is.null(w))
cancor.default(x, y, ...)
else stop("weights are not yet implemented") # lm.wfit(x, y, w, ...)
z$call <- cl
z$terms <- mt
z
}
TESTME <- FALSE
if (TESTME) {
# need to get latest version, 0.6-1 from R-Forge
install.packages("candisc", repo="http://R-Forge.R-project.org")
library(candisc)
data(Rohwer)
# this bombs: needs intercept removed
cc <- cancor.formula(cbind(SAT, PPVT, Raven) ~ n + s + ns + na + ss,
data=Rohwer)
## Error in chol.default(Rxx) :
## the leading minor of order 1 is not positive definite
#this works as is
cc <- cancor.formula(cbind(SAT, PPVT, Raven) ~ -1 + n + s + ns + na +
ss, data=Rohwer)
cc
## Canonical correlation analysis of:
## 5 X variables: n, s, ns, na, ss
## with 3 Y variables: SAT, PPVT, Raven
##
## CanR CanRSQ Eigen percent cum
## 1 0.6703 0.44934 0.81599 77.30 77.30
## 2 0.3837 0.14719 0.17260 16.35 93.65
## 3 0.2506 0.06282 0.06704 6.35 100.00
##
## Test of H0: The canonical correlations in the
## current row and all that follow are zero
##
...
}