Skip to content
Prev 13521 / 398502 Next

Analysis of Varience question.

Shawn Way <sway at tanox.com> writes:
1978 actually
In this case you could use
 aov(response ~ treatment)
Yes but bear in mind that Box, Hunter and Hunter are providing that
example for pedagogical reasons, not because one would usually form
the analysis of variance table in that way.

Analysis of variance tables in R do not give the contribution of the
constant although the underlying model does, by default, include a
constant.  To get the constant into the analysis of variance table you
must introduce an explicit constant term into the model and exclude
the implicit constant term.  The following transcript shows this

 > BHH6 <- data.frame(diet = rep(LETTERS[1:4], c(4, 6, 6, 8)),
 +      Time = c(62,60,63,59,63,67,71,64,65,66,68,66,71,67,68,68,
 +               56,62,60,61,63,64,63,59))
 > aov(Time ~ diet, data = BHH6)  # default representation of aov model
 Call:
    aov(formula = Time ~ diet, data = BHH6)

 Terms:
                 diet Residuals
 Sum of Squares   228       112
 Deg. of Freedom    3        20

 Residual standard error: 2.366432 
 Estimated effects may be unbalanced
 > summary(aov(Time ~ diet, data = BHH6))  # an ANOVA table
             Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value    Pr(>F)    
 diet         3  228.0    76.0  13.571 4.658e-05 ***
 Residuals   20  112.0     5.6                      
 ---
 Signif. codes:  0 `***' 0.001 `**' 0.01 `*' 0.05 `.' 0.1 ` ' 1 
 > BHH6$const <- rep(1, nrow(BHH6))  # add a constant column to the data frame
 > summary(aov(Time ~ const + diet - 1, data = BHH6))
           Df Sum Sq Mean Sq   F value    Pr(>F)    
 const      1  98304   98304 17554.286 < 2.2e-16 ***
 diet       3    228      76    13.571 4.658e-05 ***
 Residuals 20    112       6                        
 ---
 Signif. codes:  0 `***' 0.001 `**' 0.01 `*' 0.05 `.' 0.1 ` ' 1 

Notice that the last call to aov uses a formula with "- 1" in it
to remove the implicit constant term from the model.

Box, Hunter and Hunter (or BH^2, as we know it) is a great book but
the computational methods described there are rather dated.  The
book was published nearly 25 years ago and at that time it had been
around in the form of class notes for many, many years.  Bill Hunter
used to joke that the book had reached the age of majority (i.e. was
21 years old) before it was published.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._