ifelse misusage become more and more frequent...

"jropers at freesurf" == jropers at freesurf fr <jropers at freesurf.Fr>
    on Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:24:33 +0100 writes:

    jropers at freesurf> ...ifelse, a function of three **vector**
    jropers at freesurf> arguments....  Yes !!  I misunderstood the
    jropers at freesurf> functioning of ifelse.

Seems to happen more an more often.
When I teach "R programming" I nowadays usually emphasize that people
should often *NOT* use ifelse().
In other words, I think ifelse() is much over-used in situations
where something else would be both clearer and more efficient.

Is there a document / book around which lures people into
misusing ifelse() so frequently?

Perhaps it is because here two concepts are involved which may be 
less familiar to people: program control and vectorisation. I wonder 
whether the manual pages for ifelse and if need to do more than just 
See also the other one. I notice that the page for if has a very 
helpful health warning about putting braces round everything. This is 
unusual in the manual pages which usually describe what is rather 
than tell you explicitly what to do to achieve salvation. Perhaps I 
could suggest that the if page tells you what error message you get 
when you wanted ifelse and that the ifelse page has a health warning 
along the lines of 'ifelse is not if and they are often confused with 
difficult to understand results'.

[snip]


Michael Dewey
http://www.aghmed.fsnet.co.uk