Skip to content
Prev 306485 / 398506 Next

problem with nls starting values

Good point, Ben.

I followed up my earlier reply offline with a brief note to Benedikt
pointing out that "No" was the wrong answer: "maybe, maybe not" would
have been better.

Nevertheless, the important point here is that even if you do get
convergence, the over-parameterization means that the estimators don't
mean anything: they are poorly determined/imprecise. This is a
tautology, of course, but it is an important one. My experience is, as
here, the poster wants to fit the over-parameterized model because
"theory" demands it. That is, he wants to interpret the parameters
mechanistically. But the message if the data is: "Sorry about that
guys. Your theory may be fine, but the data do not contain the
information to tell you what the parameters are in any useful way."
We gloss over this distinction at our peril, as well as that of the
science.

Cheers,
Bert
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> wrote: