Hi Petr,
Your idea looks like logically. So, can we say this with your idea; the
expected number of computation in unique(sample(...)) is fewer than
sample(...). Because, the expected length is 63.39677 in unique case, while
the expected length is 100 in non-unique case ?
Thanks for reply,
Helin.
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Comparison-of-the-amount-of-computation-tp3448436p3448986.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.