Skip to content
Prev 293878 / 398502 Next

Binomial GLM, chisq.test, or?

Simone Santoro 
Hi Tal,

Thanks for replying.
(1) I am going to use cohort as a factor and (2) no, there are no strong
correlation between "cohort" and the other predictors.

I am using a binomial GLM and the lack of significance of "cohort" seems it
was due to one of the 11 levels (the base level) of this factor to be very
scarcely represented, in other words there was just one individual of cohort
1996.
I did not realize it before 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-find-the-error-in-a-Binomial-GLM-I-am-doing-please-help-tc4615340.html
someone  made me point it out.

--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Binomial-GLM-chisq-test-or-tp4608941p4616774.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Thread (6 messages)

Simone Santoro Binomial GLM, chisq.test, or? May 4 Tal Galili Binomial GLM, chisq.test, or? May 4 Simone Santoro Binomial GLM, chisq.test, or? May 7 Tal Galili Binomial GLM, chisq.test, or? May 7 Matt Stati Gwet's AC1 May 7 Simone Santoro Binomial GLM, chisq.test, or? May 8