Message-ID: <419DC786.40301@statistik.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: 2004-11-19T10:14:30Z
From: Uwe Ligges
Subject: More problems checking an R package
In-Reply-To: <8975119BCD0AC5419D61A9CF1A923E95E8989F@iahce2knas1.iah.bbsrc.reserved>
michael watson (IAH-C) wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am having a few more miscellaneous problems when I run R CMD check on
> my package.
>
> All of the early stuff works OK. I get a WARNING at the "checking S3
> generic/method consistency" stage, where it seems to think two of my
> fucntions are inconsistent with plot() (I don't understand why it thinks
> that).
>
> I then get another WARNING indicating that I have an undocumented data
> set called ".Traceback", but I can't find anything called .Traceback on
> my entire system.
>
> Finally, all my examples run fine, all my Latex is checked and that's
> OK, and I get:
>
> * creating mypackage-manual.tex ... OK
> * checking mypackage-manual.tex ... ERROR
> LaTeX errors when creating DVI version.
> This typically indicates Rd problems.
See the log file in the check directory, it shows where the error comes
from.
> This is in contrast to the first line of the output which states:
>
> * checking for working latex ... OK
>
> So I'm kind of stuck here. I'd like to ask if there is something I can
> use to check my Rd files WITHOUT having to run the examples, as the
> examples all take about 30 minutes to run, and so it's not a quick
> bug-tracking cycle...
R CMD check --help tells you:
R CMD check --no-examples .....
Uwe Ligges
> Any ideas, comments welcome!
>
> Thanks
> Mick
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html