Message-ID: <CAErODj_LhiB5mBizMv_eEvk3d8wZ6c9s1NvYoghLN8S6Uq1f0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: 2011-10-05T17:29:53Z
From: Paul Johnson
Subject: Tinn-R
In-Reply-To: <009201cc82c3$04424fb0$7800a8c0@ATRPDC.ATRColumbia.Com>
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Charles McClure <cmcclure at atrcorp.com> wrote:
> I am new to R and have recently tried Tinn-R with very mixed and unexpected
> results. ?Can you point me to a Tinn-R tutorial on the web or a decent
> reference book?
>
In my experience, TINN-R does not work so well, and most new users are
recommended to try instead Notepad++ with the addon components
R2notepad++ or Rstudio. I have MS Windows setup tips here
http://web.ku.edu/~quant/cgi-bin/mw1/index.php?title=Windows:AdminTips
Until I see evidence otherwise, I'm concluding that TINN-R was the
best in 2008, but it is harder to configure now and there's no reason
to prefer it over Notepad++. "Real Men"[tm] still use Emacs, but new
users may not have enough muscles :)
pj
> Thank you for your help;
>
> Charles McClure
--
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504
University of Kansas