Skip to content
Back to formatted view

Raw Message

Message-ID: <3F4C78EE@webmail.mcgill.ca>
Date: 2003-06-04T16:42:16Z
From: Tanya Murphy
Subject: Estimates for proportions

Thanks Spencer!

That's what I was looking for. My data are not at all normal and neither are 
the transformed values because The majority are at an upper limit that is not 
1 (these are grouped data abstracted from a paper). There's nothing that can 
be done about that, but it was good to compare the CIs for the original and 
back-transformed values. The SD for the transformed disitribution was huge 
compared to the one from the original values, though. Is this normal?

Tanya