Skip to content
Prev 138234 / 398506 Next

glm: offset

On 03-Mar-08 03:19:01, Wensui Liu wrote:
Well, this is where it gets interesting!
The above statement of the "logic" begs the question (i.e. assumes
the answer).

I would go according to the general interpretation of "offset"
in LM and GLM modelling -- an "offset" is

  "a quantitative variable whose regression coefficient
   is known to be 1"
  [McCullough and Nelder (1983) "Generalised Linear Models",
    page 138]

Since the GLM for a Poisson regression with log link is to model

  L = log(mu) = a + b1*X1 + B2*X2 + ...

mu is the Poisson mean, and where X1, X2, ... are the raw
(untransformed, unless you have other reasons for tranforming
them prior to bringing them into the regression) explanatory
variables, if X1 is the variable you wish to use as "offset"
in the above sense then it should be used un-transformed.
On this basis, the answer to John Sorkin's question should be:
don't use log(NumUniPt), use NumUniPt.

There's a potential confusion here in that presumably
"NumUniPt" may be a positive variable whose distribution
in the data may be skew, i.e. the sort of variable that
you may feel urged to take the log of before using it.

But that would be an "other reason" in the sense of my
comment above.

After all, suppose "NumUniPt" denoted a variable in the
data that could take negative values. Would you be happy
to use log(NumUniPt) in that case?

Best wishes to all,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 03-Mar-08                                       Time: 07:51:32
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------