manova
After running a MANOVA test, I used univariate Fs in
order to see
which IV(s) was contributing the difference.
However, I have been critised about it,
and the reason I was given is:
"MANOVA allows you to explore multiple
associations but
does not excuse you from tracing out the causal
relationships
for each variable. This does not mean falling back on
bivariate
correlation."
Yes, this is right! I had this problem too, and I used the following
article:
\bibitem{4}Kropf, Siegfried (1988). \textsl{Application of Multiple Test
Procedures to the Combination of Multivariate and Univariate Tests with
Varying Variable Sets}, Biometric Journal 30, pp. 461-470
If there are more then 4 variables, you'll run into great computational
troubles, I have some very problem specific code here to solve this for up
to 8 variables, if you are interested, drop me a mail.
Torsten
Do you have any suggestion for me to find out
mentioned causal
relationships? g. baris dept of economics university of sheffield
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._