Skip to content
Prev 106757 / 398525 Next

Error: cannot take a sample larger than the population

Partial Summary and discussion:
=====================
Thank you to Chao Gai, Chuck Cleland, and Jim Lemon for their suggestion 
to use replace=T in R.
There is a problem though (see below)

In the Splus7, sample is defined as
-------------
sample(x, size = n, replace = F, prob = NULL, n = NULL, ...)  where 
replace=F
In Splus7

xlrmN1 <- sample(c(0,1,2),400 ,prob=c(0.02 ,0.93 ,0.05 ))

and the 

table(xlrmN1)/400
    0    1    2
 0.02 0.93 0.05
show that "sample" is working exactly as expected based on the prob vector.

When "sample" is used in Splus7 with replacement we see the following 
result:
 > xlrmN1 <- sample(c(0,1,2),400 ,replace=T,prob=c(0.02 ,0.93 ,0.05 ))
 > table(xlrmN1)/400
      0     1      2
 0.0125 0.925 0.0625
which I think is working again as expected.

In the R, sample is defined as
---------

sample(x, size, replace = FALSE, prob = NULL)

So the above statement with replace=F did not work (reported error)
but with replace=T produced,
xlrmN1
     0      1      2 
0.0200 0.9225 0.0575 

which is not exactly the sample with the probabilities provided (0.02,0.93,0.05)

Now let's return to the concept of replace=F and replace=T.
When I ask "sample" to select a sample of 400 from a vector of 3 with NO replacement, I would think the following
a). create a very large sample from 0, 1, and 2. b). From this large sample, based on the prob vector select without replacement.
c). As result I expect the probability of selected sample to be exactly the same with the prob vector (As in Splus7)

When I ask "sample" to select a sample of 400 from a vector of 3 with replacement, I would think the following
a). create a very large sample from 0, 1, and 2. b). From this large sample, based on the prob vector select with replacement, 
which means some of the previous selected 0, 1, 2 can be selected again.
c). As result I expect the probability of selected sample to be NOT exactly the same with the prob vector (As in Splus7 and R).

So there are two conclusions: "sample" in R is not working correct, OR I am missing some precision as a rounding error to produce

prob=c(0.02 ,0.93 ,0.05 ).
Am I misunderstanding the "sample" function in R?

Any suggestions are appreciated.
TIA,

Aldi
Aldi Kraja wrote:

            
--