Skip to content
Prev 79692 / 398502 Next

R-help Digest, Vol 32, Issue 26

In addition to the response below, Doug Bates has talked about this on
this list previously. I did
The first one that came up has Doug's response to this question as well

Harold
 

-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch
[mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Alan Cobo-Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:53 AM
To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] R-help Digest, Vol 32, Issue 26

r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 at 6:00 AM -0500
wrote:

Ronaldo,
Try Harold's suggestion. The df still won't agree, because lmer (at
least in its current version) just puts an upper bound on the df. But
that should be OK, because all those t tests are approximations anyways,
and you can get better confidence intervals (credible intervals,
whatever) by using the mcmcsamp() function that works with lmer() alan
"Doran, Harold" <HDoran at air.org> responded:
"Ronaldo Reis-Jr." <chrysopa at gmail.com>, wrote:
all? Denom=54.
--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.		(207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology		(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742     		alanc at maine.edu

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception

______________________________________________
R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide!
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html