terms.inner

Question:
 I am trying to impliment a function in R that we use quite regularly in
Splus, and it fails due to a lack of the "terms.inner" function in R.
The substitute is?

Part question and part soapbox:
Why remove terms.inner from R?  It's little used, but rather innocuous.

AFAIK it wasn't removed, it just hasn't ever been implemented. Probably 
no-one in the early years of R tried to port any code that used it -- 
there were a number of functions added back then just because the survival 
package used them, such as subscripting on terms objects.

Mostly soapbox:
 I figured it was no big deal, as I originally discovered the use of
terms.inner from reading the plot.gam function.  So I'd just see what
plot.gam does in R.

plot.gam

Error: object "plot.gam" not found

 Ok, I know this function has to exist.  I even remember that there is some
sort of multi-colon secret handshake that will convince R to let you look
at it, although I don't remember the form.  This Nixonesque passion with
hiding things is one of the reasons I still prefer Splus.

Perhaps not the best soapbox example. There are at least two gam 
implementations, but they are both in add-on packages. Neither of them 
hides its plot.gam in a namespace, but you do need to install and load the 
package.  You presumably want Trevor Hastie's one, which is in the "gam" 
package, rather than Simon Woods' one in the "mgcv" package.

BTW, termplot() does many of the same things as Hastie's plot.gam(). It is 
also not hidden. If I understand correctly what terms.inner does, 
termplot() uses two functions:
     pf <- envir
     carrier <- function(term) {
         if (length(term) > 1)
             carrier(term[[2]])
         else eval(term, data, enclos = pf)
     }
     carrier.name <- function(term) {
         if (length(term) > 1)
             carrier.name(term[[2]])
         else as.character(term)
     }
to do the job.


 	-thomas

Thomas Lumley			Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
tlumley at u.washington.edu	University of Washington, Seattle