Skip to content
Prev 314732 / 398502 Next

nested, unbalanced anova

Dear Peter,

Thank you for the clarification, since one (I hope) popular add-on that
computes type-II and -III tests for repeated-measures designs is the Anova()
function in the car package. 

The type-II tests are, in my opinion, preferable, because they are maximally
powerful, e.g., for main effects when the interactions to which the main
effects are marginal are zero in the population (the situation in which a
main effect test is typically of interest), but I'd argue (not here, because
it would take more space than is reasonable in an email), that the type-III
tests test reasonably interpretable hypotheses.

Steven: A forthcoming paper in the R Journal, available as a preprint at
<http://journal.r-project.org/accepted/2012-02/Fox+Friendly+Weisberg.pdf>,
explains how to use the Anova() and linearHypothesis() functions in the car
package for univariate and multivariate tests in repeated-measures designs.
The paper doesn't, however, try to clarify the distinctions among "type-I,"
"II," and "III" tests.

Best,
 John

-----------------------------------------------
John Fox
Senator McMaster Professor of Social Statistics
Department of Sociology
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada