about the array transpose
Mr. Disease, As Uwe points out, the syntax is pretty clear, but it is perhaps worth mulling over why: R> identical(A[,,1], t(B[1,,])) TRUE to confirm that you understand the function. Michael Weylandt PS -- Might I suggest, if you insist on anonymity, a different handle? I'm answering on my lunch break and I'm finding that you are providing me with all sorts of icky mental images... 2011/10/3 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>:
On 03.10.2011 03:29, venerealdisease wrote:
Hi, all, I am a newbie for [R] Would anyone help me how to transpose a 3x3x3 array for 1:27 Eg. A<-array(1:27, c(3,3,3) What is the logic to transpose it to B<-aperm(A, c(3,2,1))
It simply says third dimension first, second second, and first third. Uwe Ligges
Because I found I could not imagine how it transposes, anyone could solve my problem? And most important I could get the number what I expected, I think if I could not figure it out, I will have a confused concept which will affect my future learning of 3D models in [R]. Highly appreciated and thanks. VD -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/about-the-array-transpose-tp3866241p3866241.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.