Message-ID: <x24rfpjzb5.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
Date: 2002-06-27T01:16:46Z
From: Peter Dalgaard
Subject: Output from make check
In-Reply-To: <20020627002233.GD27640@hortresearch.co.nz>
Patrick Connolly <p.connolly at hortresearch.co.nz> writes:
> I've since deleted the previous version but the problem persisted
> until I removed the old library itself which was in a directory which
> is not the default location. I've not made any reference to it since I
> installed 1.5.1, so it was surprising that it was being used.
>
> Does that mean there is a mechanism that looks for a likely library by
> the name even though its directory has not been mentioned? I could
> understand that happening if it was in the default location, but
> evidently it searches for the first occurrence of something that looks
> like a library even before it looks in the default location where a
> newer one exists.
>
> Is that a feature?
No. But watch out for environment variable R_LIBS (check the last bit of
?library).
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._