Skip to content
Prev 76596 / 398502 Next

SpatStat Kest - Error Message help

(1) Questions about contributed packages (such as spatstat) should in the
first instance be directed to the authors/maintainers of the package (in
this case Adrian Baddeley and myself) rather than to the list.

(2) It's very hard to say what's causing your problem without digging into
the specifics.  If you could email the problematic data set (it's only 17
points, after all!) to me and/or Adrian, we could probably figure out
what's causing the hiccup.

(3) It sound's like you are using roll-your-own code to create
(effectively) a critical envelope for your estimated K function. Why
aren't you using the built-in function envelope()?

(4) I believe that 999 replicates is usually overkill for Monte Carlo
inference; 99 reps is probably adequate.  Other uncertainties that are
always present in any real data set dwarf the lack of precision resulting
from using ``only'' 99 reps.  (Ninety-nine reps is the default in
envelope(); but you can set the number of reps to anything you want,
including 999 if you insist.)

(5) What does ``statistical significance of a point pattern'' mean?

			cheers,

				Rolf Turner
				rolf at math.unb.ca

===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, DrakeGis wrote: