Skip to content
Prev 18134 / 398502 Next

Underdispersion with anova testing methods

Using anova of a glm with test = "Chisq", I get this:

Analysis of Deviance Table

Model: poisson, link: log

Response: Days

Terms added sequentially (first to last)


                Df Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev P(>|Chi|)
NULL                              373     370.56          
Block            3    71.05       370     299.51 2.543e-15
Variety          1    94.04       369     205.47 3.096e-22
Instar           3   126.21       366      79.26 3.553e-27
Variety:Instar   3     7.74       363      71.53      0.05


Other interactions were much less prominent.  I'm only interested in
the effect of Variety, and one would expect an effect of Instar, so I
want to be able to block on Instar and Block.

Evidently, the Chisquare test does not use an estimate of the
dispersion parameter.  Were it included, the interaction would have a
much smaller probability.  Is there a good reason why one should or
should not makes such an adjustment?  In any case, will it matter when
I'm interested only in the effect of Variety?


Alternatively, could the underdispersion come from my ignoring the
fact that the insects are measured at the four different instars and
so the independence assumption is not true.  I could not think of a way
of taking that lack of independence into account.

Suggestions welcome.

Thanks