A suggestion regarding multiple replies
On 17 Nov 2003 at 15:08, Ted Harding wrote:
On 15-Nov-03 Ted Harding wrote: And the following (in today's "?for" thread) is a perfect example of what I mean: =============================================================== > From: Peter Dalgaard <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> > To: Angel <angel_lul at hotmail.com>, r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: Re: [R] ?for > Date: 17 Nov 2003 11:49:37 +0100 > > Further hint: ? is an operator, syntactically similar to + and -. > You can apply operators to the result of a for loop. Consider for > example > > x <- 1; - for (i in 1:10) x <- x * i > > (? has special semantics, but that is not noticed at parse time). =============================================================== This is just the sort of thing I love to see posted to the list, since it is an eye-opener. In fact, to really see what goes on I had to rub my eyes as follows: - for (i in 1:10) print(i) and I'm posting it hoping that it will enlighten some other people. Best wishes to all, Ted.
Indeed! look at the following:
test <- function(x) invisible(x) test(9) - test(9)
[1] -9
Kjetil Halvorsen
-------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk> Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972 Date: 17-Nov-03 Time: 15:08:38 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
______________________________________________ R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help