Minor warning about seq
I think both responses so far have missed the point, (assuming the O was a typo for zero). That is:
seq(0:1)
[1] 1 2 when
seq(0,1)
[1] 0 1 was intended. Ray Brownrigg
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010, Ista Zahn wrote:
So you are warning us that you must type zero instead of the letter O when we want to enter the value of zero? Seems pretty obvious... -Ista On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Prof. John C Nash <nashjc at uottawa.ca> wrote:
I spent more time than I should have debugging a script because I wanted ? x<-seq(0,100)*0.1 but typed ? x<-seq(O:100)*0.1 seq(0:100) yields 1 to 101, Clearly my own brain to fingers fumble, but possibly one others may want to avoid it. JN
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.