Skip to content

re| `By reference'

2 messages · Steve Wisdom, Peter Dalgaard

#
David Brahm <brahm at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

            
answer:
Still less esoteric is
[1] 55

Although I don't know if this is a good general solution to `passing by
reference' 

(BTW it behaves differently in S+
[1] 55
[1]  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10

)
#
Steve Wisdom <swisdom at deephavenfunds.com> writes:
Eh? That's not supposed to work, and it doesn't:
Error: Object "y" not found
[1] 55