Skip to content

R FAQ 2.8

4 messages · robin hankin, Bert Gunter, Uwe Ligges +1 more

#
Hi

[thanks to everyone for advice on Recall() and sapply()]

The R FAQ section 2.8 discusses how to cite R in publications, but does 
not (AFAICS) tell
me how to describe R in a sentence.

To wit, in my latest paper (destined for Rnews)  one sentence reads:

"The R programming language (3) has been applied . . ."

where reference (3) is R Core 2004.

Now, the referee has pointed out that the expression "R computer 
language" is not
to be encouraged, as R is an implementation of the S language.

How would the List rephrase my sentence above?



  I also use the phrase "R code", which the referee flags for rewording 
(on similar
grounds to the above).

Any suggestions for this?




--
Robin Hankin
Uncertainty Analyst
Southampton Oceanography Centre
European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
  tel  023-8059-7743
#
Inline below.

-- Bert Gunter
Genentech Non-Clinical Statistics
South San Francisco, CA
"The R software package (3) ... "
Get a new referee.
#
Robin Hankin wrote:

            
You might want to point the referee to the manual "R Language 
Definition" and cite the sentcence "The R language is a dialect of S 
[...]" from the Introduction of that manual.

Uwe Ligges
#
In a paper for which I recently received reviews, I have the sentence
"Statistical analyses were carried out with the R statistical system (R
Development Core Team, 2004)." Reviewers did not complain (about that).
The particular journal falls in the domain of applied psychology.

-Dave Braze
On Friday, April 1, 2005 at 8:30:22 AM, Robin Hankin wrote:
RH> Hi

RH> [thanks to everyone for advice on Recall() and sapply()]

RH> The R FAQ section 2.8 discusses how to cite R in publications, but does 
RH> not (AFAICS) tell
RH> me how to describe R in a sentence.

RH> To wit, in my latest paper (destined for Rnews)  one sentence reads:

RH> "The R programming language (3) has been applied . . ."

RH> where reference (3) is R Core 2004.

RH> Now, the referee has pointed out that the expression "R computer 
RH> language" is not
RH> to be encouraged, as R is an implementation of the S language.

RH> How would the List rephrase my sentence above?



RH>   I also use the phrase "R code", which the referee flags for rewording 
RH> (on similar
RH> grounds to the above).

RH> Any suggestions for this?