Hi, Fedora is for Fedora 9 switching to gcc 4.3. Before I test it (rawhide) I want to be sure that R is running. So my question is whether there have been issues compiling R + packages using 4.3? Stefan
gcc 4.3 any known issues?
4 messages · Stefan Grosse, Peter Dalgaard, Dirk Eddelbuettel +1 more
Stefan Grosse wrote:
Hi, Fedora is for Fedora 9 switching to gcc 4.3. Before I test it (rawhide) I want to be sure that R is running. So my question is whether there have been issues compiling R + packages using 4.3?
I suspect that not many have tried. There is an R-2.6.2 RPM in Fedora 9 alpha, so _something_ seems to work.
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:41:50PM +0100, Stefan Grosse wrote:
Hi, Fedora is for Fedora 9 switching to gcc 4.3. Before I test it (rawhide) I want to be sure that R is running. So my question is whether there have been issues compiling R + packages using 4.3?
Debian's "unstable" flavour already switched to 4.3 a while back. R, and several CRAN packages, built just fine. Mind you, those builds used Debian's gcc build and not FC/RH but I'd say go ahead. Dirk
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Stefan Grosse wrote:
Hi, Fedora is for Fedora 9 switching to gcc 4.3. Before I test it (rawhide) I want to be sure that R is running. So my question is whether there have been issues compiling R + packages using 4.3?
I suspect that not many have tried. There is an R-2.6.2 RPM in Fedora 9 alpha, so _something_ seems to work.
But enough have to have sorted out many of the issues. For example, the gcc 4.3 series uses C99-style inlining and that has been implemented (conditionally on GCC capabilities), and various bits of R have been rewritten to work around mis-compiles by the gcc 4.3 branch. But note that gcc 4.3 is not released and not even branched with rather a lot of remaining regressions. I'd be wary of using high levels of optimization: last time I looked R failed to build correctly at -O3 on x86_64, and there were more problems with packages. Surely this is a topic that the posting guide directs to R-devel -- all the issues mentioned are programming ones, not R ones.
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595