Skip to content

New York Times Article: Data Analysts Captivated by R's Power

7 messages · Art Burke, Tom Backer Johnsen, Simon Blomberg +4 more

#
Sure, that statement is in it self somewhat amusing.  But the article 
itself is very good PR.  I am sending off copies of the link to many of 
my colleagues, some sceptic, others not sceptic at all.  Thanks!

Tom
Arthur Burke wrote:

  
    
#
Maybe it's my dry Australian humour, but I think this should go into the
fortunes package.

Simon.
#
But wait, there's more...  The bit I think deserves a fortunes listing is the SAS jibe:

"I think it addresses a niche market for high-end data analysts that want free, readily available code," said Anne H. Milley, director of technology product marketing at SAS. She adds, "We have customers who build engines for aircraft. I am happy they are not using freeware when I get on a jet."

I love it. 


Bill Venables
http://www.cmis.csiro.au/bill.venables/ 


-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Simon Blomberg
Sent: Thursday, 8 January 2009 10:15 AM
To: Arthur Burke
Cc: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] New York Times Article: Data Analysts Captivated by R's Power
Maybe it's my dry Australian humour, but I think this should go into the
fortunes package.

Simon.
#
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Bill.Venables at csiro.au wrote:

            
Yep, both added to the devel-version on R-Forge (fortunes 222 and 223). 
Additionally, there is

R> fortune(224)

It's interesting that SAS Institute feels that non-peer-reviewed software 
with hidden implementations of analytic methods that cannot be reproduced 
by others should be trusted when building aircraft engines.
    -- Frank Harrell (in response to the statement of the SAS director of
       technology product marketing: "We have customers who build engines
       for aircraft. I am happy they are not using freeware when I get on a
       jet.")
       R-help (January 2009)

grx,
Z
#
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Simon Blomberg <s.blomberg1 at uq.edu.au> wrote:
The irony of that quote is great, but I'd guess it's also an effective
bit of advertising. Akin to Gary Larson's famous "what dogs hear"
cartoon (link below), I can envision many managers reading the article
and seeing something like:

"blah blah blah blah supercharged version of Microsoft's Excel
spreadsheet software that can help illuminate data trends more clearly
blah blah blah blah ...."

;-)

Kingsford Jones

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sluggerotoole/153603564/
#
Simon Blomberg wrote:
It is somewhat humourous even in damper London.
But I think what the sentence was trying to say is that
a WHOLE LOT of what is done in Excel would be
better done in R.

Patrick Burns
patrick at burns-stat.com
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")