Skip to content

ESS and R ver 1.3.0/ graph menu/ save PDF

3 messages · S.McClatchie, A.J. Rossini, Peter Malewski

#
"SM" == S McClatchie <S.McClatchie> writes:
---------------------------------------------------------
On 28 Jun 01,, A.J. Rossini wrote (re: Re: ESS and R ver 1.3.0/ graph menu/ save PDF):
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for that Tony,

The command line works fine, just as you point out. I was using the 
menu bar on the graph which looks the same as the RGui even though I 
always use ESS. I guess the simple answer is don't use the Rgui 
facilities when you are running R under ESS. Simple enough.

Cheers

Sam

Sam McClatchie, Research scientist (fisheries acoustics))))))))))
NIWA (National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd)
PO Box 14 901, Kilbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand
s.mcclatchie at niwa.cri.nz 

                    /\
...>><xX(?> // \\
                 /// \\\   
                //// \\\\
               ///  <?)Xx><<
              /////  \\\\\\
        ><(((?>   
  >><(((?>   ...>><xX(?>O<?)Xx><<

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
#
SM> The command line works fine, just as you point out. I was
    SM> using the menu bar on the graph which looks the same as the
    SM> RGui even though I always use ESS. I guess the simple answer
    SM> is don't use the Rgui facilities when you are running R under
    SM> ESS. Simple enough.

I think this is an R bug.  But to verify, check that you actually have
the problem when running Rterm.exe outside of ESS?  (as the followup
mail I wrote, correcting my mistakes, suggested)?

best,
-tony
#
It also might be a windows problem. with win 95b, 
gnu-emacs 20.7.1 and ess 5.1.16 the menu-bar
pdf-file works fast and reliable (perhaps a memory problem?).

Peter.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:38:47PM +1200, S.McClatchie wrote: