Hi everyone, Hi ggplot users in particular,
ggplot makes it very easy to plot things given their names when you
use it interactively (and therefore can provide the names of the
columns).
qplot(x,foo,data=A) where A has columns (x,y,foo,bar) for example
but I would like to use this from inside a function to which the name
of the column is given. I cannot find an elegant way to make this
work. Here are my attempts:
#------------------------------------------------------------
library(ggplot2)
A = data.frame(x=rep(1:10,10), y=rep(1:10,each=10), u=runif(100),
v=rnorm(100))
# goal: extract values for y<=5 and plot them, either for u or v
foo1 <- function(uv="u")
{
# solution 1: do not use the data argument at all
# (forces the use of qplot, could be more elegant)
B = A[A$y<=5,]
qplot(B$x, B$y, fill=B[[uv]], geom="tile")
}
foo2 <- function(uv="u")
{
# solution 2: extract and rename the colums, then use the data argument
# (enables ggplot but could be shorter)
B = A[A$y<=5,c("x","y",uv)]
names(B)[3] = "value"
# rem: cannot use rename since rename(B,c(uv="value")) would not work
qplot(x, y, fill=value, data=B, geom="tile")
# or
# ggplot(B,aes(x=x,y=y,fill=value)) + geom_tile()
}
foo3 <- function(uv="u")
{
# solution 3: use the data argument and perform the extraction
directly in it
# (elegant and powerful but can't make it work)
ggplot(A[A$y<=5,c("x","y",uv)],aes(x=x,y=y,fill=???)) + geom_tile()
# or
ggplot(A[A$y<=5,],aes(x=x,y=y,fill=???)) + geom_tile()
# or ...
}
print(foo1("u"))
print(foo1("v"))
print(foo2("u"))
print(foo3("u"))
#------------------------------------------------------------
Any help in making foo3 work would be appreciated. Thanks in advance
for your expertise.
JiHO
---
http://jo.irisson.free.fr/
use ggplot in a function to which a column name is given
5 messages · jiho, Hadley Wickham
Follow up.
On 2007-December-13 , at 10:45 , jiho wrote:
foo1 <- function(uv="u")
{
# solution 1: do not use the data argument at all
# (forces the use of qplot, could be more elegant)
B = A[A$y<=5,]
qplot(B$x, B$y, fill=B[[uv]], geom="tile")
}
---> actually this does not even work currently: Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "B" not found Which only leaves the most inelegant solution: 2 JiHO --- http://jo.irisson.free.fr/
Hi Jiho,
The key to solving this problem is to use aes_string instead of aes.
Instead of the complicated munging that aes does to get the names of
the variables, aes_string works directly with strings, so that:
aes_string(x = "mpg", y = "wt") == aes(x = mpg, y = wt)
So your function would look like:
foo4 <- function(uv="u") {
ggplot(A, aes_string(x = "x", y= "y", fill = uv)) + geom_tile()
}
Or
ggplot(A, aes(x=x, y=y)) + aes_string(fill=uv) + geom_tile()
Hope that helps! (And I've made a note to better document aes_string
so you can discover after looking at aes)
Hadley
On 12/13/07, jiho <jo.irisson at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone, Hi ggplot users in particular,
ggplot makes it very easy to plot things given their names when you
use it interactively (and therefore can provide the names of the
columns).
qplot(x,foo,data=A) where A has columns (x,y,foo,bar) for example
but I would like to use this from inside a function to which the name
of the column is given. I cannot find an elegant way to make this
work. Here are my attempts:
#------------------------------------------------------------
library(ggplot2)
A = data.frame(x=rep(1:10,10), y=rep(1:10,each=10), u=runif(100),
v=rnorm(100))
# goal: extract values for y<=5 and plot them, either for u or v
foo1 <- function(uv="u")
{
# solution 1: do not use the data argument at all
# (forces the use of qplot, could be more elegant)
B = A[A$y<=5,]
qplot(B$x, B$y, fill=B[[uv]], geom="tile")
}
foo2 <- function(uv="u")
{
# solution 2: extract and rename the colums, then use the data argument
# (enables ggplot but could be shorter)
B = A[A$y<=5,c("x","y",uv)]
names(B)[3] = "value"
# rem: cannot use rename since rename(B,c(uv="value")) would not work
qplot(x, y, fill=value, data=B, geom="tile")
# or
# ggplot(B,aes(x=x,y=y,fill=value)) + geom_tile()
}
foo3 <- function(uv="u")
{
# solution 3: use the data argument and perform the extraction
directly in it
# (elegant and powerful but can't make it work)
ggplot(A[A$y<=5,c("x","y",uv)],aes(x=x,y=y,fill=???)) + geom_tile()
# or
ggplot(A[A$y<=5,],aes(x=x,y=y,fill=???)) + geom_tile()
# or ...
}
print(foo1("u"))
print(foo1("v"))
print(foo2("u"))
print(foo3("u"))
#------------------------------------------------------------
Any help in making foo3 work would be appreciated. Thanks in advance
for your expertise.
JiHO
---
http://jo.irisson.free.fr/
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
On 2007-December-13 , at 15:56 , hadley wickham wrote:
Hi Jiho,
The key to solving this problem is to use aes_string instead of aes.
Instead of the complicated munging that aes does to get the names of
the variables, aes_string works directly with strings, so that:
aes_string(x = "mpg", y = "wt") == aes(x = mpg, y = wt)
So your function would look like:
foo4 <- function(uv="u") {
ggplot(A, aes_string(x = "x", y= "y", fill = uv)) + geom_tile()
}
Or
ggplot(A, aes(x=x, y=y)) + aes_string(fill=uv) + geom_tile()
Hope that helps! (And I've made a note to better document aes_string
so you can discover after looking at aes)
great! I knew you would have thought this through. That's perfect. As always there's the trade-off between writing code and documenting the code already written. In this case the trade-off turned toward the code part I guess. Autodetection of strings by aes would be even greater but that would prevent me to assign the actual strings "u", "x", "y" to an aes element, which I don't see as a problem for non text related functions though... Thanks again. JiHO --- http://jo.irisson.free.fr/
great! I knew you would have thought this through. That's perfect. As always there's the trade-off between writing code and documenting the code already written. In this case the trade-off turned toward the code part I guess. Autodetection of strings by aes would be even greater but that would prevent me to assign the actual strings "u", "x", "y" to an aes element, which I don't see as a problem for non text related functions though...
It can come in handy when combining multiple datasets: mtcarsq <- as.data.frame(mtcars ^ 2) ggplot(mtcars, aes(x=mpg, y=wt)) + geom_point(aes(colour = "Raw")) + geom_point(aes(colour="Squared"), data=mtcarsq) and aes is complicated enough as it is. Hadley