Hi ML,
For random forest, I thought that the out-of-bag performance should be
the same (or at least very similar) to the performance calculated on a
separated test set.
But this does not seem to be the case.
In the following code, the accuracy computed on out-of-bag sample is
77.81%, while the one computed on a separated test set is 81%.
Can you please check what I am doing wrong?
Thanks in advance and best regards.
library(randomForest)
library(ISLR)
Carseats$High <- ifelse(Carseats$Sales<=8,"No","Yes")
Carseats$High <- as.factor(Carseats$High)
train = sample(1:nrow(Carseats), 200)
rf = randomForest(High~.-Sales,
????????????????? data=Carseats,
????????????????? subset=train,
????????????????? mtry=6,
????????????????? importance=T)
acc <- (rf$confusion[1,1] + rf$confusion[2,2]) / sum(rf$confusion)
print(paste0("Accuracy OOB: ", round(acc*100,2), "%"))
yhat <- predict(rf, newdata=Carseats[-train,])
y <- Carseats[-train,]$High
conftest <- table(y, yhat)
acctest <- (conftest[1,1] + conftest[2,2]) / sum(conftest)
print(paste0("Accuracy test set: ", round(acctest*100,2), "%"))
Random Forest: OOB performance = test set performance?
3 messages · thebudget72 m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com, Peter Langfelder
I think the only thing you are doing wrong is not setting the random seed (set.seed()) so your results are not reproducible. Depending on the random sample used to select the training and test sets, you get slightly varying accuracy for both, sometimes one is better and sometimes the other. HTH, Peter
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 8:49 PM <thebudget72 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ML,
For random forest, I thought that the out-of-bag performance should be
the same (or at least very similar) to the performance calculated on a
separated test set.
But this does not seem to be the case.
In the following code, the accuracy computed on out-of-bag sample is
77.81%, while the one computed on a separated test set is 81%.
Can you please check what I am doing wrong?
Thanks in advance and best regards.
library(randomForest)
library(ISLR)
Carseats$High <- ifelse(Carseats$Sales<=8,"No","Yes")
Carseats$High <- as.factor(Carseats$High)
train = sample(1:nrow(Carseats), 200)
rf = randomForest(High~.-Sales,
data=Carseats,
subset=train,
mtry=6,
importance=T)
acc <- (rf$confusion[1,1] + rf$confusion[2,2]) / sum(rf$confusion)
print(paste0("Accuracy OOB: ", round(acc*100,2), "%"))
yhat <- predict(rf, newdata=Carseats[-train,])
y <- Carseats[-train,]$High
conftest <- table(y, yhat)
acctest <- (conftest[1,1] + conftest[2,2]) / sum(conftest)
print(paste0("Accuracy test set: ", round(acctest*100,2), "%"))
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Thanks Peter. Indeed by setting a seed the two results are similar. I am self-studying and wanted to make sure I understood the concept of OOB samples and how much "reliable" were performance metrics calculated on them. It seems I did got it. That's good :)
On 4/11/21 6:34 AM, Peter Langfelder wrote:
I think the only thing you are doing wrong is not setting the random seed (set.seed()) so your results are not reproducible. Depending on the random sample used to select the training and test sets, you get slightly varying accuracy for both, sometimes one is better and sometimes the other. HTH, Peter On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 8:49 PM<thebudget72 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ML,
For random forest, I thought that the out-of-bag performance should be
the same (or at least very similar) to the performance calculated on a
separated test set.
But this does not seem to be the case.
In the following code, the accuracy computed on out-of-bag sample is
77.81%, while the one computed on a separated test set is 81%.
Can you please check what I am doing wrong?
Thanks in advance and best regards.
library(randomForest)
library(ISLR)
Carseats$High <- ifelse(Carseats$Sales<=8,"No","Yes")
Carseats$High <- as.factor(Carseats$High)
train = sample(1:nrow(Carseats), 200)
rf = randomForest(High~.-Sales,
data=Carseats,
subset=train,
mtry=6,
importance=T)
acc <- (rf$confusion[1,1] + rf$confusion[2,2]) / sum(rf$confusion)
print(paste0("Accuracy OOB: ", round(acc*100,2), "%"))
yhat <- predict(rf, newdata=Carseats[-train,])
y <- Carseats[-train,]$High
conftest <- table(y, yhat)
acctest <- (conftest[1,1] + conftest[2,2]) / sum(conftest)
print(paste0("Accuracy test set: ", round(acctest*100,2), "%"))
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guidehttp://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.