Skip to content

building R 2.4.0 on aix

2 messages · Brian Ripley, Roy Heimbach

#
I've not seen any response to either of these messages, and so am replying 
in an attempt to provide some explanation.  No core R developer has access 
to AIX, nor have we had for some time.  (Most of the recent workarounds 
for AIX have come from the kind efforts of Ei-ji Nakama.)  It does seem 
AIX rivals Darwin (the underlying OS of MacOS X) for being the least alike 
of the Unix-alikes (but fortunately we have Simon Urbanek to explain 
Darwin to us).

We don't know if R 2.4.0 has been built successfully on AIX: we do know 
that no one reported any problems in the alpha/beta/RC test period.  If no 
one tested it, this indicates a lack of support for the R developers from 
the AIX community.  I believe I have seen a report which indicated that R 
2.3.1 was built successfully.

Some more specific comments to Eric Harley:
It seems your 'f95' is not a conventional Fortran compiler.  But you have 
not told us what compiler it is: only if we know the full story can we 
advise against it.
Without telling us what they are, the experts here cannot help.
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Eric Harley wrote:

            
There have been replies, but no responses to those replies.  We often do 
not find out if problems do get resolved.

  
    
#
Prof. Ripley:

Thanks for a clear statement of the situation.  Lack of response to
my post, coupled with the many prompt and knowledgeable responses
to other posts, led me to believe something like this must be true.

I have access to an AIX machine, and probably enough help to sort out
the 2.4.0 build issues under AIX.  I'm hoping to post something useful
to other AIX users in January or February.

Cheers,
Roy Heimbach
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: