I want to do something like this. avo(q~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l) avo(r~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l) avo(s~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l) (There's likely a better way to do this actually, but I think this'll work.) How do I define e=a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l such that the following works? avo(q~e) avo(r~e) avo(s~e) Tom
Putting all independent variables in one variable so performing many similar tests is more convenient
4 messages · Thomas Levine, Henrique Dallazuanna, Gabor Grothendieck
oops, I mean aov
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Thomas Levine <thomas.levine at gmail.com> wrote:
I want to do something like this. avo(q~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l) avo(r~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l) avo(s~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l) (There's likely a better way to do this actually, but I think this'll work.) How do I define e=a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l such that the following works? avo(q~e) avo(r~e) avo(s~e) Tom
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20090201/87a1da8d/attachment-0001.pl>
Try: aov(yield ~., npk)
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Thomas Levine <thomas.levine at gmail.com> wrote:
I want to do something like this. avo(q~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l) avo(r~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l) avo(s~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l) (There's likely a better way to do this actually, but I think this'll work.) How do I define e=a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l such that the following works? avo(q~e) avo(r~e) avo(s~e) Tom
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.