Skip to content

code to provoke a crash running rterm.exe on windows

4 messages · Anthony Damico, Ben Bolker, Martin Maechler

#
hi, here's a minimal reproducible example that crashes my R 3.3.0 console
on a powerful windows server.  below the example, i've put the error (not
crash) that occurs on R 3.2.3.

should this be reported to http://bugs.r-project.org/ or am i doing
something silly?  thanx





# C:\Users\AnthonyD>"c:\Program Files\R\R-3.3.0\bin\x64\Rterm.exe"

# R version 3.3.0 (2016-05-03) -- "Supposedly Educational"
# Copyright (C) 2016 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
# Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)

# R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
# You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.
# Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details.

  # Natural language support but running in an English locale

# R is a collaborative project with many contributors.
# Type 'contributors()' for more information and
# 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications.

# Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or
# 'help.start()' for an HTML browser interface to help.
# Type 'q()' to quit R.

sessionInfo()
# R version 3.3.0 (2016-05-03)
# Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
# Running under: Windows Server 2012 R2 x64 (build 9600)

# locale:
# [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252
# [2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252
# [3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252
# [4] LC_NUMERIC=C
# [5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252

# attached base packages:
# [1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base

memory.limit()
# [1] 229247

# works fine
grpsize = ceiling(10^5/26)

# simple data.frame
my_df <-
  data.frame(
  x=rep(LETTERS,each=26*grpsize),
  v=runif(grpsize*26),
  stringsAsFactors=FALSE
  )

# mis-match the number of elements
my_df <-
  data.frame(
  x=rep(LETTERS,each=26*grpsize),
  v=runif(grpsize*26),
  stringsAsFactors=FALSE
  )

# make this much bigger
grpsize = ceiling(10^8/26)

# simple data.frame
my_df <-
  data.frame(
  x=rep(LETTERS,each=grpsize),
  v=runif(grpsize*26),
  stringsAsFactors=FALSE
  )

# mis-match the number of elements
my_df <-
  data.frame(
  x=rep(LETTERS,each=26*grpsize),
  v=runif(grpsize*26),
  stringsAsFactors=FALSE
  )

# CONSOLE CRASH WITHOUT EXPLANATION
C:\Users\AnthonyD>



# # # # # running the exact same commands on r version 3.2.3 on windows:

C:\Users\AnthonyD>"C:\Program Files\R\R-3.2.3\bin\x64\Rterm.exe"

memory.limit()
# [1] 229247

grpsize = ceiling(10^8/26)

# mis-matched number of elements
my_df <-
  data.frame(
  x=rep(LETTERS,each=26*grpsize),
  v=runif(grpsize*26),
  stringsAsFactors=FALSE
  )
# Error in if (mirn && nrows[i] > 0L) { :
  # missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
# In addition: Warning message:
# In as.data.frame.vector(x, ..., nm = nm) :
  # NAs introduced by coercion to integer range

# # # # but console does not crash # # # #
#
Anthony Damico <ajdamico <at> gmail.com> writes:
#
> Anthony Damico <ajdamico <at> gmail.com> writes:
    >> 
    >> hi, here's a minimal reproducible example that crashes my
    >> R 3.3.0 console on a powerful windows server.  below the
    >> example, i've put the error (not crash) that occurs on R
    >> 3.2.3.
    >> 
    >> should this be reported to http://bugs.r-project.org/ or
    >> am i doing something silly?  thanx


    > From the R FAQ (9.1):

    > If R executes an illegal instruction, or dies with an
    > operating system error message that indicates a problem in
    > the program (as opposed to something like ?disk full?),
    > then it is certainly a bug.

    >   So you could submit a bug report, *or* open a discussion
    > on r-devel at r-project.org (which I'd have said was a more
    > appropriate venue for this question in any case) ...

Indeed.
In this case, this is a known problem -- not just of R, but of
many programs that you can run ---
You are requesting (much) more memory than your computer has
RAM, and in this situation -- depending on the OS ---
your computer will kill R (what you saw) or your it will become
very slow trying to shove all memory to R and start swapping
(out to disk other running / sleeping processes on the
computer).

Both is very unpleasant...
But it is you as R user who asked R to allocate an object of
about 41.6 Gigabytes (26 * 1.6, see below).

As Ben mentioned this may be worth a discussion on R-devel ...
or you rather follow up the existing thread opened by Marius
Hofert  three weeks ago, with subject
 "[Rd] R process killed when allocating too large matrix (Mac OS X)"

  -->  https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-May/072648.html
 
His simple command to "crash R" was

   matrix(0, 1e5, 1e5)

which for some of use gives an error such as
Error: cannot allocate vector of size 74.5 Gb

but for others it had the same effect as your example.
BTW: I repeat it here in a functionalized form with added
     comments which makes apparent what's going on:


## Make simple data.frame
mkDf <- function(grpsize, wrongSize = FALSE) {
    ne <- (if(wrongSize) 26 else 1) *grpsize
    data.frame(x = rep(LETTERS, each = ne),
               v = runif(grpsize*26), stringsAsFactors=FALSE)
}

g1 <- ceiling(10^5/26)
d1 <- mkDf(g1) # works fine
str(d1)
## 'data.frame':	100022 obs. of  2 variables:

dP <- mkDf(g1, wrong=TRUE)# mis-matching the number of elements

str(dP) # is 26 times larger
## 'data.frame': 2600572 obs. of  2 variables: .....


# make this much bigger
gLarge <- ceiling(10^8/26)

dL <- mkDf(gLarge) # works "fine" .. (well, takes time!!)
str(dL)
## 'data.frame': 100000004 obs. of  2 variables:
as.numeric(print(object.size(dL)) / 1e6)
## 1600002088 bytes
## [1] 1600.002  Mega  i.e.,  1.6 GBytes

## Well, this will be 26 times larger than already large ==> your R may crash *OR*
 ## your computer may basically slow down to a crawl, when R requests all its memory...
if(FALSE) ## ==> do *NOT* evaluate the following lightly !!
dLL <- mkDf(gLarge, wrong=TRUE)
# CONSOLE CRASH WITHOUT EXPLANATION
# C:\Users\AnthonyD>
#
hi, thanks to you both!  note the large memory.limit() on the machine
before the crash (200+ gb) so i'm not sure it's a simple overloading
explosion?  i've filed a bug report..

https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16927



On Saturday, May 28, 2016, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>
wrote: