Skip to content

protentially serious R error

3 messages · Ben Bolker, David L Carlson, (Ted Harding)

#
Cutting and pasting from the R posting guide -- I think this advice
has special force when responding to FAQ 7.31 questions (I've seen 
several within the last few days, and at least two were answered by
three different people:

When responding to a very simple question, use the following algorithm:

    compose your response
    type 4*runif(1) at the R prompt, and wait this many hours
    check for new posts to R-help; if no similar suggestion, post your response 

(This is partly in jest, but if you know immediately why it is suggested, you
probably should use it! Also, it's a nice idea to replace 4 by the number of
years you have been using R or S-plus.)
#
Congratulations, you've reached the First Circle of the R Inferno. Only 8
more to go

http://www.burns-stat.com/pages/Tutor/R_inferno.pdf

----------------------------------------------
David L Carlson
Associate Professor of Anthropology
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843-4352
#
That applies to the OP (Xiaofeng, aka "liuxf"), of course.
Ben himself is a guardian of all Circles (loc.cit.).

With regard to Ben's quote from the Posting Guide, it occurs
to me that the more years one has been using R, the more
rapdily one should (or should be able to) answer a question.
The implication of the Posting Guide is that the time it should
take one to respond to a question is inversely proportional
to one's experience of using R. This is turn could imply that
some users, with the longest experience, may never respond
(since, by the time their response is due, adequate responses
have probably already been furnished by others, somewhat less
experienced). There may be some empirical evidence for this. :)

Best wishes to all,
Ted.
On 01-Dec-2012 17:54:50 David L Carlson wrote:
-------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at wlandres.net>
Date: 01-Dec-2012  Time: 19:30:19
This message was sent by XFMail