rm(list=ls(all=TRUE)) graphics.off() # make a test matrix: nr<- 3 nc<- 4 # the data: ( m<- matrix((1:(nr*nc)), nr, nc) ) [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] 1 4 7 10 [2,] 2 5 8 11 [3,] 3 6 9 12 # the way that levelplot (and image) displays the data: t(m)[dim(t(m))[1]:1, ] [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 10 11 12 [2,] 7 8 9 [3,] 4 5 6 [4,] 1 2 3 # undo what levelplot does by performing the inverse transformation inverse<- function(x) t(x[dim(x)[1]:1, ]) windows(); levelplot(m, main="levelplot(m)") windows(); levelplot(inverse(m), main="levelplot(inverse(m))") > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:28:17 +0000 (GMT) > From: Jenny Barnes <jmb at mssl.ucl.ac.uk> > Subject: [R] upside down image/data > To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Message-ID: <200612111228.kBBCSHrj013960 at msslhb.mssl.ucl.ac.uk> > Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Dear R-community, > > I am looking for some simple advice - I have a matrix (therefore 2 dimensional) > of global temperature. > > Having read R-help I think that when I ask R to image() or levelplot() my matrix > will it actually appear upside down - I think I therefore need to use the line: > > levelplot(temperature.matrix[,ncol(output.temp):1], ........) > to get it looking like it was on the globe due to the matrix rows increasing in > number down the matrix in its dimensions on longitude and latitude but the > y-axis coordinates increase up the axis. > > Can anyone simply tell me whether this is correct as I find it very hard to know > which way up my data should be and I cannot tell which is correct simply by > looking at it! > > Many thanks for your time in reading this problem, > > Jenny Barnes
upside down image/data
1 message · Thomas Harte