Hi, All. I have a logistic regression model that I have run. The
question came up: which of these regressors is more important than
another?
(I'm using Design)
Logistic Regression Model
lrm(formula = iconicgesture ~ ST + SSP + magnitude + Condition +
Expertise, data = d)
Coef S.E. Wald Z P
Intercept -3.2688 0.2854 -11.45 0.0000
ST 2.0871 0.2730 7.64 0.0000
SSP 0.7454 0.3031 2.46 0.0139
magnitude -0.9905 0.6284 -1.58 0.1150
Condition 0.9506 0.2932 3.24 0.0012
Expertise 0.8508 0.2654 3.21 0.0013
The real question is that, since both ST and SSP load significantly
into the model, how do I show that ST has a bigger/smaller/similar
effect than SSP?
thanks in advance!
greg
logistic regression: differential importance of regressors
2 messages · Greg Trafton, Frank E Harrell Jr
Greg Trafton wrote:
Hi, All. I have a logistic regression model that I have run. The
question came up: which of these regressors is more important than
another?
(I'm using Design)
Logistic Regression Model
lrm(formula = iconicgesture ~ ST + SSP + magnitude + Condition +
Expertise, data = d)
Coef S.E. Wald Z P
Intercept -3.2688 0.2854 -11.45 0.0000
ST 2.0871 0.2730 7.64 0.0000
SSP 0.7454 0.3031 2.46 0.0139
magnitude -0.9905 0.6284 -1.58 0.1150
Condition 0.9506 0.2932 3.24 0.0012
Expertise 0.8508 0.2654 3.21 0.0013
The real question is that, since both ST and SSP load significantly
into the model, how do I show that ST has a bigger/smaller/similar
effect than SSP?
thanks in advance!
greg
One thing you can do is to compute what proportion of the total likelihood ratio chi-square statistic is due to each variable by removing one at a time and looking at difference in Model L.R. (assuming both have same observations missing). Note that you are making heavy linearity assumptions. You can also use the bootstrap to get a confidence interval on the rank of the chi-square statistic a variable has among all competing chi-squares. Frank
Frank E Harrell Jr Professor and Chair School of Medicine
Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University