Skip to content

logistic regression (weights)

1 message · Edoardo M Airoldi

#
hi all,
 I am fitting a logistic regression model on binary data.  I care about 
the fitted probabilities, so I am not worried about infinite 
(or non-existent) MLEs.  I use:
I understand the three ways to fit model, and in my case Y is a factor,
one column
My question is about the weights.  I can use integer weights, which
makes more mathematical sense, and
or i can use
which makes more sense for my problem, but the mathematic is weak as I am
using non integer successes in a bernoulli...  I estimate the accuracy
'out of the bag' over 10000 experiments to get

          | integer wgt          | non-int wgt
 -------- + -------------------- + --------------------
 accuracy | A = 94.9%  B = 82.3% | A = 94.7%  B = 83.3%
 std.dev. |      2.3%      15.4% |      2.6%      13.2%
 avg. AIC | 707                  | 124

 As I understand, non-integer weights are more respectful of what I
observe since instead of augmenting the successes on the rare class, which
I did not observe, they simply down-weight the successes on the populus
class.  The populations can be thought as equal, and only the sample sizes
are unbalanced.
 Predictions also look better, so I was hoping that the continuity of the
Binomial for N in [0,1] ans X in [0,1] could guarantee me that my results
still make sense, but I am not sure.  Any thoughts?
Thanks

Edo