The decimal point is 1 digit(s) to the right of the |
46 | 9
48 | 27344567889
50 | 3477801246
52 | 0455746
54 | 2567979
56 | 1133789028
58 | 4
This plot is inaccurate since there are no values 469, 483, 484, etc. in the data.
If I remove one value from the input, then the result appears correct:
x <- c(479,482,487,493,494,494,495,496,497,498,498,499,503,504,507,507,508,
The decimal point is 1 digit(s) to the right of the |
47 | 9
48 | 27
49 | 344567889
50 | 34778
51 | 01246
52 | 04557
53 | 46
54 | 25679
55 | 79
56 | 1133789
57 | 028
Is there a limit to the length of the input argument, a bug in the function, or something I'm missing?
Thanks.
The decimal point is 1 digit(s) to the right of the |
46 | 9
48 | 27344567889
50 | 3477801246
52 | 0455746
54 | 2567979
56 | 1133789028
58 | 4
This plot is inaccurate since there are no values 469, 483, 484, etc. in the data.
There's a 479, and a 493, etc. Since you only have even numbered stems
you get two decades of leaves on each line. The ones for the 460's
would precede the ones for the 470's if there were any; you can see that
does happen in that the 480's do precede the 490's.
Duncan Murdoch
If I remove one value from the input, then the result appears correct:
x <- c(479,482,487,493,494,494,495,496,497,498,498,499,503,504,507,507,508,
The decimal point is 1 digit(s) to the right of the |
47 | 9
48 | 27
49 | 344567889
50 | 34778
51 | 01246
52 | 04557
53 | 46
54 | 25679
55 | 79
56 | 1133789
57 | 028
Is there a limit to the length of the input argument, a bug in the function, or something I'm missing?
Thanks.
The help isn't particularly helpful, but you need to play with the
scale argument.
The range of your first dataset is long enough that you're getting
only even-numbered stems by default.
Try these:
x1 <- c(479,482,487,493,494,494,495,496,497,498,498,499,503,504,507,507,508,
510,511,512,514,516,520,524,525,525,527,534,536,542,545,546,547,549,
557,559,561,561,563,563,567,568,569,570,572,578,584)
stem(x1, scale=1)
summary(x1)
stem(x1, scale=2)
x2 <- c(479,482,487,493,494,494,495,496,497,498,498,499,503,504,507,507,508,
510,511,512,514,516,520,524,525,525,527,534,536,542,545,546,547,549,
557,559,561,561,563,563,567,568,569,570,572,578)
stem(x2, scale=1)
summary(x2)
stem(x2, scale=2)
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Zibeli Aton via R-help
<r-help at r-project.org> wrote:
Using R-3.3.1 on Linux I seem to sometimes get inaccurate stem-and-leaf plots using stem. For example:
x <- c(479,482,487,493,494,494,495,496,497,498,498,499,503,504,507,507,508,
The decimal point is 1 digit(s) to the right of the |
46 | 9
48 | 27344567889
50 | 3477801246
52 | 0455746
54 | 2567979
56 | 1133789028
58 | 4
This plot is inaccurate since there are no values 469, 483, 484, etc. in the data.
If I remove one value from the input, then the result appears correct:
x <- c(479,482,487,493,494,494,495,496,497,498,498,499,503,504,507,507,508,
The decimal point is 1 digit(s) to the right of the |
47 | 9
48 | 27
49 | 344567889
50 | 34778
51 | 01246
52 | 04557
53 | 46
54 | 25679
55 | 79
56 | 1133789
57 | 028
Is there a limit to the length of the input argument, a bug in the function, or something I'm missing?
Thanks.