Eh? The original message says it's the design matrix that is perfectly
collinear after the transformation, not the response.
I don't know much about this type of data, but seems like you could just fit
the model w/o intercept to eliminate the collinearity, no? It's the
interpretation of the result that may be tricky, I think.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Spencer Graves [mailto:spencer.graves at pdf.com]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Christoph Lehmann
Cc: Spencer Graves; r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] compositional data: percent values sum up to 1
"glm" will do multinomial logistic regression. However, if J
is large,
I doubt if that will do what you want. If it were my
problem, I might
feel a need to read the code for "glm" and modify it to do
what I want.
Perhaps someone else can suggest something better.
hth. spencer graves
Christoph Lehmann wrote:
I want to do a logistic regression analysis, and to compare with, a
discriminant analysis. The mentioned power maps are my
the dependent variable (not mentioned so far) is a diagnosis
(ill/healthy)
thanks for the interest and the help
Christoph
On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 21:01, Spencer Graves wrote:
What are you trying to do? What I would do with this
factors.
spencer graves
Christoph Lehmann wrote:
again, under another subject:
sorry, maybe an all too trivial question. But we have
frequency spectra and to have the same range for the data
subjects, we just transformed them into % values, pseudo-code:
power[i,j]=power[i,j]/sum(power[i,1:J])
of course, now we have a perfect linear relationship in
since all power-values for each subject sum up to 1.
How shall we solve this problem: just eliminate one column of x, or
introduce a restriction which says exactly that our power
1 for each subject?
Thanks a lot
Christoph