3 messages · Peter Flom, Gabor Grothendieck
Goran wrote <<< The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt. Thanks for all the input.
Well, nothing against MikTeX, but ProteXt also works fine with R. Peter Peter L. Flom, PhD Assistant Director, Statistics and Data Analysis Core Center for Drug Use and HIV Research National Development and Research Institutes 71 W. 23rd St www.peterflom.com New York, NY 10010 (212) 845-4485 (voice) (917) 438-0894 (fax)
Goran wrote
<<< The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt. Thanks for all the input.
Just to clarify, I have never used proTeXt and my comment was based on having used fptex and MiKTeX and the fact that the batchfiles distribution provides specific additional R support for MiKTeX.
Goran wrote
<<< The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt. Thanks for all the input.
Just to clarify, I have never used proTeXt and my comment was based on having used fptex and MiKTeX and the fact that the batchfiles distribution provides specific additional R support for MiKTeX.
One other comment. If anyone is using proTeXt or other TeX distribution and wants to modify miktex-update.bat and Rfind.bat to support proTeXt or other TeX distribution I would be happy to provide a link to it from the batchfiles documentation or even include it in batchfiles, if desired.