An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: nem el?rhet? URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110421/2b2b582b/attachment.pl>
Rcmdr vs SPSS in hungarian
3 messages · Tamas Barjak, Jeremy Miles, csrabak
Just because it comes from a book does not make it true or correct. Books are subject to considerably less peer review than journal articles. Publishers will publish a book written by (almost) anyone - I know this, because I've written some of them and they were published. There really isn't much difference, most of the time, between different sorts of residuals, usually they are used for eyeballing potential problems in your data, in which case it doesn't matter which you use. If you want residuals where you know the distribution under the null hypothesis, then you should use the studentized (which SPSS calls studentized-deleted). Jeremy 2011/4/21 Tamas Barjak <tamas.barjak02 at gmail.com>:
Rem?lem valaki ezt is elolvassa, meg?rti, ?s v?laszol a probl?m?mra. A gondom a k?vetkez?: Kisz?moltattam a marad?kokat az R commanderrel, ?s az SPSS -el is. ?s itt kezd?dik igaz?n a gond. Az SPSS a Studentiz?lt t?r?lt marad?kokra ugyanazt az eredm?nyt dobta, mint az Rcmdr a Studentiz?lt marad?kokra. Az SPSS outputja biztos hogy j?, mivel egy k?nyv adatait haszn?ltam fel, ?s az eredm?nyek megegyeznek a k?nyv eredm?nyeivel. Az Rcmdr outputja viszont nem. Nem ?rtem, hogy ha ?n a Studentiz?lt marad?kokat akarom kisz?molni az Rcmdr-rel, akkor mi?rt a Studentiz?lt t?r?lt marad?kokat kapom??? Hogy kapom meg a Studentiz?lt marad?kokat??? Rcmdr--> Models--> Add observation statistics to data--> Studentized residuals A f?rumra tegnap este vetettem fel ezt a probl?m?t, de a hi?nyos nyelvtud?som miatt sokan nem ?rtett?k a probl?m?m. Rem?lem valaki v?laszol! K?sz?n?m sz?pen el?re is! ? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Jeremy Miles Psychology Research Methods Wiki: www.researchmethodsinpsychology.com
Em 21/4/2011 11:36, Jeremy Miles escreveu:
Just because it comes from a book does not make it true or correct. Books are subject to considerably less peer review than journal articles. Publishers will publish a book written by (almost) anyone - I know this, because I've written some of them and they were published.
I canvass for inclusion in the next fortunes release! -- Cesar Rabak